Client was a Corporal in the U.S. Marine Corps stationed in Okinawa who was charged with assault, drunk and disorderly, provoking speech and gestures, and false official statement. The charges resulted from a fight with three other Marines after Client had consumed alcohol and was accused of making derogatory and harassing comments towards a female Marine. Client was put on legal hold, an investigation was opened, and Client hired Attorney Karns to defend him. Client’s command intended to prefer charges against Client for a special court-martial with the intent to offer a plea deal which included an Other Than Honorable Discharge. Attorney Karns was able to persuade the command to instead impose nonjudicial punishment on Client who was subsequently retained in the Marines Corps.
Client was a Cpl in the USMC charged with four specifications of assault and a specification of drunk and disorderly conduct, all of which were referred to a special court-martial. Client hired Attorney Karns to defend him. Client had accumulated three years of service and did not want to be separated from the USMC or receive a criminal conviction. Attorney Karns persuaded Client’s command to agree a pretrial agreement in which Client received a summary court-martial and was retained in the USMC.
Client was a SrA in the Air Force whose wife accused him of domestic violence and gave the security forces a written statement. Client hired Attorney Karns. Client’s wife, with Attorney Karns, completed an Affidavit of Nonprosecution (ANP) and explained what really happened. Attorney Karns submitted the ANP to Client’s command. Client’s command dropped the charges and took no further action.
Client was an Air Force Major and pilot who was charged with eight different specifications for choking, striking, and threatening to kill his wife over a five-year period. Client was facing a maximum sentence of thirty-four years and a Dismissal (Dishonorable Discharge) from the USAF. Client hired Attorney Karns, who, after the Art. 32 hearing, persuaded Client’s command to decline a court-martial. Client instead accepted non-judicial punishment (NJP), Reprimand, and forfeiture of half pay for two months. Subsequent to the NJP, the command initiated an administrative separation action against Client and sought an Other Than Honorable Discharge. At the Separation Board, Attorney Karns presented Client’s outstanding service record and the expert testimony of Client’s therapist who testified that Client suffered from PTSD due to a deployment. The Board discharged Client, but awarded him a General Discharge Under Honorable Conditions.
Client was a Navy Airman who was accused of an assault after having already received nonjudicial punishment for a prior assault. Client fervently wanted to stay in the Navy and hired Mr. Karns to represent him. Due to Client’s ADD condition, Mr. Karns persuaded Client’s command to impose nonjudicial punishment rather than pursue a court-martial. Client received extra duty and was reduced from E-4 to E-3, but received no loss of pay or restriction. Client was retained in the Navy and is still eligible for an Honorable Discharge upon the completion of his service.